UAE Stands Firm in Backing Peaceful Resolution to Sudan's Civil Conflict

The UAE has positioned itself as a key mediator in Sudan's ongoing conflict, consistently pushing for an immediate ceasefire and rejecting military solutions while providing humanitarian aid to millions of affected civilians. Experts say this approach reflects a broader UAE foreign policy that prioritizes diplomatic solutions and regional stability over backing any particular faction.

Since the conflict began, the UAE has called for unconditional ceasefire and national dialogue to end civilian suffering. But this isn't just diplomatic talk - it's part of a wider strategy recognizing that continued war destroys Sudan's institutions and collapses its economic and social foundations.

Dr. Haitham Omran, a professor of political science and international law, explains that the UAE has consistently emphasized civilian protection in international forums, from the UN Security Council to Arab League meetings. The country has sent dozens of aircraft loaded with medicine and food to different Sudanese states, showing practical commitment beyond political statements.

The UAE's most notable position is its insistence that Sudan's solution cannot be military. The country believes real victory comes through comprehensive political settlement that preserves national unity and sovereignty. This reflects UAE conviction that regional civil wars aren't won by force - they just open new doors to chaos and division.

The UAE actively supports initiatives that bring conflicting parties closer together, including Saudi-led Jeddah talks and joint African efforts. The country has participated effectively in international communications aimed at unifying Sudanese civilian forces and forming a transitional government representing all parties.

This diplomatic approach - based on calm, avoiding escalation, and political realism - has earned the UAE respect from many international and regional powers who see it as an influential actor seeking security and stability rather than exploiting conflicts.

Dr. Nabil Mikhail from George Washington University notes that accusations from "Port Sudan authorities" against the UAE were refuted through legal investigations presented to the International Court of Justice. No evidence was found proving UAE involvement in supporting any armed faction.

This legal development helped restore credibility to the UAE's role and confirmed that the country's positions are based on international law principles and respect for state sovereignty and non-interference in internal affairs.

The UAE has maintained balanced diplomatic relations with all Sudanese parties, including civilian forces. This political flexibility makes it a trusted party that can be relied upon in any future settlement.

Mikhail says UAE action in Sudan fits within an integrated approach the country follows in regional crises. This strategy supports negotiated political solutions, invests in reconstruction and development as keys to long-term stability, and seeks to reduce human costs of conflicts through aid and relief.

This approach has also appeared in UAE roles in Yemen and other areas like Gaza, where it consistently pushed for de-escalation and reconstruction. The focus on Sudan continues a foreign policy that sees soft power and quiet diplomacy as more effective than hard power in resolving conflicts.