Trump Threatens to Withhold Funding from New York if Mandani Wins

President Donald Trump threatened to cut federal funding to New York City if Democratic candidate Zuhran Mamdani wins today's mayoral election. Trump said on Truth Social that Mamdani would leave the city with "zero chance of success or even survival" and warned he would provide only the minimum funding required by law if Mamdani takes office.

New Yorkers head to the polls today to choose their next mayor in what's shaping up to be a consequential race for America's largest city. The outcome could directly impact billions in federal funding that flows to New York for everything from infrastructure projects to social services.

Polls show Mamdani leading by a wide margin against former Democratic Governor Andrew Cuomo, who's running as an independent this time around. Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa trails significantly and appears to have little chance of winning.

Mamdani, a member of the New York State Assembly, is running on an aggressive progressive platform. His proposals include rent control measures, free bus transit, and free childcare programs. He plans to fund these initiatives by raising taxes on wealthy individuals and corporations.

The federal funding threat adds a new dimension to local politics. New York City receives substantial federal money for transportation, housing, and emergency services. Any significant cuts could force the city to scale back services or raise local taxes to fill budget gaps.

Trump's intervention reflects the broader political stakes involved. New York has long been a Democratic stronghold, but the federal government controls key funding streams that cities depend on. This creates potential leverage points for federal officials who disagree with local policies.

Polling stations close at 9 PM local time, with initial results expected shortly after. The winner will take control of a city budget exceeding $100 billion and oversee services for more than 8 million residents.

The race highlights growing tensions between progressive urban policies and federal oversight. Mamdani's tax-and-spend approach appeals to his base but could face practical challenges if federal support disappears.